Skip to main content

The Cost of Burn Pits, Part One


The Cost of Burn Pits,  Part One

by Marisa De La Villa

When Beau Biden, the son of Former President Joe Biden, returned from his deployment in Iraq, he brought with him more than just memories of war. Years after his return, he was diagnosed with brain cancer– something his family believes was linked to toxic exposure from burn pits1. His story is just one of thousands. Veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan continue to battle health complications long after they’ve left the battlefield. Their stories are crucial to understanding the irreversible damage caused to both human beings and the natural world, and are key to spreading awareness on the dangers of burn pits2.

During the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. military used massive open-air burn pits to dispose of waste, including plastics, electronics, chemicals, medical supplies, and even amputated limbs. This combination of substances created a thick, black smoke that poured into the air, filling the natural world with a toxic mix of heavy metals, carcinogens, and hazardous compounds, all of which directly impacted the soldiers stationed near these pits3. As they breathed in these fumes, the soldiers unknowingly exposed themselves to long-term and even deadly health risks4.

Iraq and Afghanistan were both central figures to the global conflicts of the early 2000s. Following the September 2001 attacks, the United States sent in forces to invade Afghanistan. The goal was simple: dismantle al-Qaeda and overthrow the Taliban government that had protected its leaders5. However, this “quick and easy” mission became much more than that– it had evolved into what would soon become the longest war in U.S. history, lasting twenty years, from 2001 to 2021. This destabilizing conflict brought with it years of violence, political turmoil, and humanitarian crises that still run rampant today6.

In March 2003, U.S. forces invaded Iraq with the goal to end the rule of Saddam Hussein and destroy Iraqi weapons of mass destruction– a claim that was never substantiated since the weapons were never found7. The U.S. invasion triggered widespread instability, unleashing violence, insurgencies, and drawn-out occupation that completely shattered the nation leaving it defenseless. The war not only devastated Iraq’s infrastructure, but it had a major toll on the environment, turning cities and landscapes into zones of pollution, destruction, and war8.

Throughout these military operations, the use of burn pits became an unknown danger, directly impacting U.S. military personnel, while also contributing to environmental degradation in countries already devastated by war. Toxic exposure didn’t just affect those in the front lines, though. It left behind a legacy of illness and contamination that directly impacted soldiers, civilians, and ecosystems alike. The aftermath of these wars reveals the true impact of them– these consequences extend far beyond the battlefield9. They impact both human beings and the natural world.

But– why do burn pits pose such a threat? These large, open-air sites were used by the U.S. military outside of the United States as a way to dispose of distinct materials that don’t mix well. Unlike commercial incinerators, which are controlled and moderated to burn waste at high temperatures to reduce any harmful emissions, burn pits were totally unregulated, releasing toxic smoke directly into the air, where anyone and anything could be exposed to hazardous material10.

Exposure to this smoke could bring about both short-term and long-term health risks, especially to those stationed near these pits for extended periods, or even those with preexisting conditions. There were immediate effects, like eye irritation and discomfort while breathing, but these were merely temporary. On the other hand, there has been increasing concern over the more severe consequences of this exposure– for example, respiratory diseases, neurological conditions, and rare cancers, which developed at alarming rates11. Yet, for years, their suffering was almost silenced, completely dismissed. Their conditions remained unrecognized by the government despite widespread reports of illness among these veterans. Research on the full impact of burn pits is unfortunately quite limited, but there have been a few cases of successful studies. For example, a 2022 study, conducted by Timothy Olsen, Dennis Caruana, and a few other researchers, examined 21 U.S. veterans exposed to burn pits, finding that they all had signs of lung damage. Some of these people exhibited significant declines in respiratory function despite the fact they didn’t smoke12. These are just 21 veterans– there are still so many people who were exposed to these pits (both U.S. veterans and civilians) who have no idea what the extent of this exposure has done to them.

The environmental toll in both Iraq and Afghanistan was just as severe. Contaminated soil, poisoned water supplies, and widespread air pollution all contributed to the almost irreversible and lasting damage that has plagued local communities. The water supply in war zones was directly contaminated by oil from military vehicles and depleted uranium from ammunition, something that only continued to endanger both the human and animal populations of the area. The continued destruction of forests and natural resources not only devastated ecosystems, but it created a long-term damage to biodiversity in these regions, something that will persist for generations13.

 

Notes:

  1. “The Facts about Beau Biden’s Cancer,” Mount Sinai Health System, accessed March 21, 2025, https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2015/the-facts-about-beau-bidens-cancer.
  2. “Exposure to Burn Pits and Other Specific Environmental Hazards,” Veterans Affairs, accessed March 21, 2025, https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/specific-environmental-hazards/.
  3. Leo Shane III, “What Are Burn Pits? Why Are Military Veterans Worried about Them?,” Military Times, August 19, 2022, https://www.militarytimes.com/news/burn-pits/2022/03/29/what-are-military-burn-pits-and-why-are-veterans-worried-about-them/#:~:text=Until%20the%20mid%2D2010s%2C%20burn,chemical%20mixtures%20and%20medical%20waste. See also: "The 'Burn Pits' of Iraq and Afghanistan" National Public Radio. January 31st, 2010. [Excerpt: "Their medical incinerators would go out, and they would put amputated body parts from Iraqis or other civilians, not from the troops, in the burn pits."] https://www.npr.org/2010/01/31/123187642/the-burn-pits-of-iraq-and-afghanistan 
  4. Shane, "What Are Burn Pits? . . ." 
  5. “Timeline: U.S. War in Afghanistan,” Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 21, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/timeline/us-war-afghanistan.
  6. Afghanistan War: How did 9/11 lead to a 20-Year War? | IWM, accessed March 20, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/afghanistan-war-how-did-911-lead-to-a-20-year-war.
  7. “The Iraq War,” Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 21, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/timeline/iraq-war.
  8. Ibid
  9. Veterans Health Administration US Department of Veterans Affairs, “Va.Gov: Veterans Affairs,” Protect your health, December 13, 2013, https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/burnpits/registry.asp.
  10. 10 things to know about burn pits - VA public health, accessed March 20, 2025, https://www.publichealth.va.gov/docs/exposures/ten-things-to-know-fact-sheet.pdf.
  11. Ibid
  12. Timothy Olsen et al., “Iraq/Afghanistan War Lung Injury Reflects Burn Pits Exposure,” Nature News, August 29, 2022, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18252-2.
  13. “Environmental Costs,” The Costs of War, accessed March 21, 2025, https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/environmental#:~:text=The%20water%20supply%20in%20the,have%20also%20been%20adversely%20affected.



Works Cited

 

Afghanistan War: How did 9/11 lead to a 20-Year War? | IWM. Accessed March 20, 2025. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/afghanistan-war-how-did-911-lead-to-a-20-year-war. 

“Environmental Costs.” The Costs of War. Accessed March 21, 2025. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/environmental#:~:text=The%20water%20supply%20in%20the,have%20also%20been%20adversely%20affected

“Exposure to Burn Pits and Other Specific Environmental Hazards.” Veterans Affairs. Accessed March 21, 2025. https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/specific-environmental-hazards/

National Public Radio. "The 'Burn Pits' of Iraq and Afghanistan" All Things Considered. January 31st, 2010. https://www.npr.org/2010/01/31/123187642/the-burn-pits-of-iraq-and-afghanistan 

Shane III, Leo. “What Are Burn Pits? Why Are Military Veterans Worried about Them?” Military Times, August 19, 2020. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/burn-pits/2022/03/29/what-are-military-burn-pits-and-why-are-veterans-worried-about-them/#:~:text=Until%20the%20mid%2D2010s%2C%20burn,chemical%20mixtures%20and%20medical%20waste

“The Facts about Beau Biden’s Cancer.” Mount Sinai Health System. Accessed March 21, 2025. https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2015/the-facts-about-beau-bidens-cancer

“The Iraq War.” Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed March 21, 2025. https://www.cfr.org/timeline/iraq-war

“Timeline: U.S. War in Afghanistan.” Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed March 21, 2025. https://www.cfr.org/timeline/us-war-afghanistan

Olsen, Timothy, Dennis Caruana, Keely Cheslack-Postava, Austin Szema, Juergen Thieme, Andrew Kiss, Malvika Singh, et al. “Iraq/Afghanistan War Lung Injury Reflects Burn Pits Exposure.” Nature News, August 29, 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18252-2

US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. “Va.Gov: Veterans Affairs.” Protect your health, December 13, 2013. https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/burnpits/registry.asp

10 things to know about burn pits - VA public health. Accessed March 20, 2025. https://www.publichealth.va.gov/docs/exposures/ten-things-to-know-fact-sheet.pdf


transcripción en español

Cuando Beau Biden, el hijo del expresidente Joe Biden, regresó de su despliegue en Iraq, trajo consigo algo más que recuerdos de guerra. Años después de su regreso, le diagnosticaron cáncer cerebral, algo que su familia cree que estuvo relacionado con la exposición tóxica a los burn pitso las hogueras que fueron utilizadas en esta época. Su historia es solo una de miles. Los veteranos que sirvieron en Iraq y Afganistán siguen enfrentando complicaciones de salud mucho después de haber dejado el campo de batalla. Sus relatos son sumamente importantes para poder comprender el daño irreversible causado tanto a los seres humanos como al mundo natural, y son clave para crear conciencia sobre los peligros de estas hogueras.

Durante las guerras en Iraq y Afganistán, el ejército de los Estados Unidos utilizó enormes hogueras al aire libre para deshacerse de muchas cosas, por ejemplo plásticos, aparatos electrónicos, productos químicos, suministros médicos e incluso extremidades amputadas. Esta combinación de sustancias generó un humo negro que se dispersaba en el aire, llenando el entorno natural con una mezcla tóxica de metales pesados, carcinógenos y compuestos peligrosos, los cuales afectaban directamente a los soldados estacionados cerca de estas hogueras. Al inhalar estos gases, los soldados se exponían, sin saberlo, a riesgos de salud a largo plazo e incluso mortales.

Iraq y Afganistán fueron figuras centrales en los conflictos globales a principios de los 2000. Tras los ataques de septiembre del 2001, Estados Unidos envió fuerzas para invadir Afganistán. El objetivo era simple: desmantelar a Al-Qaeda y derrocar al gobierno talibán que había protegido a sus líderes. Sin embargo, esta misión “rápida y sencilla” se transformó en mucho más que eso: se convirtió en lo que pronto sería la guerra más larga en la historia de Estados Unidos, la cual duró veinte años, desde 2001 hasta 2021. Este conflicto desestabilizador trajo consigo años de violencia, agitación política y crisis humanitarias que aún al día de hoy siguen.

En marzo de 2003, las fuerzas estadounidenses invadieron Iraq con el objetivo de poner fin al régimen de Saddam Hussein y destruir las armas de destrucción masiva iraquíes, algo que nunca se pudo comprobar, ya que nunca se encontraron dichas armas. La invasión estadounidense desencadenó una gran inestabilidad, desatando violencia, insurgencias y una ocupación prolongada que dejó a la nación completamente devastada e indefensa. La guerra no solo destruyó la infraestructura de Iraq, sino que también tuvo un fuerte impacto ambiental, convirtiendo ciudades y paisajes en zonas de contaminación, destrucción y guerra.

A lo largo de estas operaciones militares, el uso de estas hogueras se convirtió en un peligro desconocido, que afectó directamente al personal militar estadounidense y también contribuyó a la degradación ambiental en países ya devastados por el conflicto. La exposición tóxica no solo afectó a quienes estaban en la línea del frente. Esta misma dejó un legado de enfermedades y contaminación que afectó directamente tanto a soldados como a civiles y ecosistemas por igual. Las secuelas de estas guerras revelan su verdadero impacto: las consecuencias se extienden mucho más allá del campo de batalla. Afectan tanto a los seres humanos como al mundo natural.

Pero ¿por qué representan tanto peligro estas hogueras? Estos sitios enormes y al aire libre fueron utilizados por el ejército estadounidense fuera del país como una forma de desechar materiales diversos que no deberían combinarse. A diferencia de los incineradores comerciales, que están controlados y regulados para quemar residuos a altas temperaturas y reducir las emisiones dañinas, las hogueras estaban completamente fuera de regulación, soltando humo tóxico directamente al aire, donde cualquier persona o ser vivo podía quedar expuesto a materiales peligrosos.

La exposición a este humo puede causar riesgos de salud a corto y largo plazo, especialmente en aquellos que estuvieron estacionados cerca de estas hogueras durante períodos prolongados, o en personas con condiciones preexistentes. Se observaron efectos inmediatos, como irritación ocular e incomodidad al respirar, pero estos solo eran temporales. Por otro lado, hay una preocupación sobre las consecuencias más graves de esta exposición—por ejemplo, enfermedades respiratorias, condiciones neurológicas y tipos raros de cáncer que se manifestaron de forma abrupta. Sin embargo, durante años, su sufrimiento fue prácticamente silenciado y completamente ignorado. Sus condiciones no fueron reconocidas por el gobierno a pesar de los numerosos reportes de enfermedades entre estos veteranos. La investigación sobre el impacto total de las hogueras suele ser limitada, pero se han realizado algunos estudios exitosos. Por ejemplo, un estudio del 2022, llevado a cabo por Timothy Olsen, Dennis Caruana y otros investigadores, examinó a 21 veteranos estadounidenses expuestos a las hogueras y encontró que todos mostraban señales de daño pulmonar. Algunas de estas personas mostraban deterioros en la función respiratoria a pesar de no fumar. Estos son solo 21 veteranos—todavía hay muchísimas personas (tanto veteranos como civiles) que fueron expuestos a estas hogueras y que no tienen idea del daño que esto les ha causado.

El impacto ambiental en Iraq y Afganistán fue igual de severo. La contaminación de los suelos, suministros de agua envenenados, y contaminación del aire contribuyeron a un daño casi irreversible y duradero que ha afectado a las comunidades locales. El suministro de agua en zonas de guerra fue directamente contaminado por el aceite de los vehículos militares y el uranio empobrecido de la munición, algo que sigue representando una amenaza tanto para la población humana como para la naturaleza local. La destrucción de bosques y recursos naturales no sólo ha devastado a los ecosistemas, sino que también ha provocado daños a largo plazo en la biodiversidad de estas regiones, algo que, desafortunadamente, seguirá por generaciones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dolores Huerta

¡Sí, se puede!  Dolores Huerta & Environmental Justice by Valeria Yraita-Zevallos  “¡Sí, Se Puede!” is the slogan often attributed to Cesar Chavez and the farm worker’s movement of the 1960s. However, the slogan “Yes, we can!” was created by activist, Dolores Huerta. Although both figures played a pivotal role in the fight for the rights of farm workers and their families in California and beyond, the intersectional activism by Dolores Huerta is often overlooked. Today, we will explore the life and social justice work of Dolores Huerta who fought for labor and women’s rights, intertwined with environmental activism.             Dolores Huerta was born on April 10th, 1930, in the mining town of Dawson, New Mexico. When Huerta was three years old her parents divorced and she moved with her mother and two brothers to Stockton, California [1] . Nevertheless, both of her parents influenced her activist personality. Huerta’s...

Birth of the Chipko Movment

The Birth of the Chipko Movement by Valeria Yraita-Zevallos The abundance of resources in one’s land does not always equate to having abundant  access  to said resources. The villagers and natives of the Himalayan regions in India felt what restricted access and privatization of their resources is like. Despite villagers depending on forests for “food, fuel, water purification, soil stabilization” [1] , and lumber in general, the government of India took ownership of this land and limited its accessibility to the villagers. Thus, although the end of the Sino-Indian conflict in 1963 brought growth in development across the Himalayas, the predominant beneficiaries became government entities and private companies [2] . Leaving villagers of these regions isolated from their own resources and shut off from conversations on how to protect the forests. However, as the government continued to overstep its control over these regions by advancing government-backed logging, the local vil...

The Fight to Protect Vieques & Culebra

  The Fight to Protect Vieques & Culebra by Marisa de la Villa Imagine young children playing outside at recess and adults forced to go about their daily routines as automatic weapons were heard going off in the nearest town plazas [1]. Vieques Island, Puerto Rico (Jun. 26, 2000) -- The guided missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60) fires her aft MK 45 5-inch/54 caliber lightweight gun mount during training held in the Puerto Rico operating area. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Shane McCoy.  This was just an average occurrence in Vieques, Puerto Rico. Not too many years ago, the rallying cry rang out:  ¡Que se vaya la marina!  The Puerto Rican people were clear in their message—“we want the U.S. Navy out!” Boricuas would chant this loudly, hoping the U.S. military would stop the bombing of Vieques and Culebra, two municipalities in the Puerto Rican archipelago. Many people are aware of the 1999 protests on Vieques island, where the accidental death ...